Suggestions for
classifying wheat by quality
Source: INTA
of Marcos Juárez City
Classifying the wheat production by levels of protein and, whenever
possible, by variety groups according to industrial quality, will contribute to improve
the reliability of the producer and the silo owner. Further more, it will let us satisfy
the industries demand and that of exportation, incrementing Argentinas
credibility and trustiness on the worlds market as a wheat exportation country.
On international markets, high quality wheat have a differential price due
to the cost of adequate technology and production handling, to achieve a high quality
grain.
To even think about achieving a correct classification, we must start by
implementing a system that is as simple as it is easy for the producer and for the silo
owner to apply.
How to classify wheat (for the producer)
- The
producers knows the varieties that they have on their fields, that is a very important
starting point to separate wheat of better generic quality, strong wheat, wheat of the
corrective type with high stability in the dough. This quality wheat (Group 1) is
on high demand by big bread makers in the Argentinean industry and countries like Brazil
use, in many cases, our wheat as correctors to their own production.
- Other
varieties (Group 2) are also of high quality. Without being corrective and having
fermentation times over 8 hours, they are appropriate for traditional Argentinean bakery
systems.
- There
are also other varieties (Group 3) which are good performers but of a deficient quality.
They are good for bakeries and preferably for direct and semi-direct methods. They have a
shorter fermentation times.
This
classification in three groups was consensus in the CONASEs Winter Cereals
Committee, and is the actual official classification based on the hectoliter weight, protein in the
grain, performance in flour, ashes, humid gluten percentage, panification readyness or W
of the alveolus report, flour stability and bread volume.
Due to
the high interaction between genotypes and the environment for industrial quality and to
the possibility of having to modify criterion, this classification is not rigid and will
be updated annually.
Protein
Content
To what is already mentioned, the producer has to add the determination
needed before the harvest of protein content on their lot.
Approximately 10 to 15 days before the harvest, the ears, leafs and stems start to turn
yellow, and this indicates that the plant has completed its physiological maturity. This
means that the grain is at a semi-hard state with about 40% humidity. After this, when the
grain has about 30% and 35% humidity (about a week before harvest time), the producer can
start to acquire samples by cutting between 300 and 400 ears from different spots in the
lot.
On its physiologic maturity, the grain completed its development, the
protein has already formed and the wheats quality is already defined. It no longer
needs to get its nourishment from the plant it self and it starts to lose humidity
progressively until it reaches a commercial or harvest humidity. The amounts of days
needed to get to commercial maturity are influenced by environment conditions and by the
variety aspect.
The quality between pre-harvest and harvest must be very similar if
adverse weather factors dont intervene.
Samples from each lot must be sun dried or by using a heater at 40°C. The
grain, properly labeled, must be taken to a laboratory so the content of protein and
gluten can be analyzed, according to the requirements.
In these cases, it is possible to detect the "white belly" and
"dotted" grains because they have not been washed by rains as it happens during
its natural maturity on the field. A high percentage of "white belly" and
"dotted" grains is indicative of a low level of protein and thus, from a soil
with deficient nitrogen fertility. Vitreous grains and darker grains in general, contain
higher contents of protein. The difference in protein on these grains can reach 4% and up
to 10% in gluten. It does not make that much sense to analyze the samples when such
starched or dotted aspect is evident.
Advantages
The advantage of
analyzing the grain a few days before the harvest is that it allows the producer to know,
ahead of time, the quality that each lot has and this, in turn, allows him or her to
decide with enough time which silo is going to be used for grains with high or low content
of protein.
Knowing the protein content and the variety in the lots, the producer
would be able to separate those of better quality (Group 1), considered in the Special
Wheat Class that has a protein level of 12% or better.
The variety of Group 1 that wont reach 12% could be mixed with other
varieties of Group 2 and 3 with protein levels of up to 11%, which is the base for
commercialization, separating them from the lots that have less than 11% protein (low
quality grain).
Any variety with les than 11% protein has a poor quality due to the lack
of enough protein to form gluten. Gluten is responsible for the structure of the though
during its use in bakeries. That is why is so important to sow in lots with a good
fertilization, natural or artificial, and if is necessary, reinforce it with a good doses
of fertilizer that has nitrogen, excellent time to improve performance and quality at the
same time.
Possibilities
for the silo owner
There is lots of equipment available in the market, some of them even use
infrared technology, and others use chemical methods to determine the content of protein
or that of gluten. The most adequate are NIRT which, in 30 seconds, they can determine
these values, allowing the gatherer to quickly make a decision on which silo the grain
belongs to depending on the protein content. This type of equipment is greatly put to use
in countries such as United States, Canada and Australia. These countries have been
classifying their production by protein content for many years now.
Is not an easy task for the gatherer to separate by variety, this is
because they usually receive the production all mixed, thus, knowing the protein levels is
enough to separate those grains that have more than 11%-11,5% of protein. This limit could
vary according to the availability of high protein wheat on each harvest. During high
performance years, protein levels might drop, achieving just a few batches of high protein
grains, thus, in these cases the limit may drop to 11%.
The high protein batches should be superior to that of commercialization
Group 3. In Canada, the protein bands are established for each grade. This system, which
groups wheat of the same grade by its content of protein, minimizes the variation of it
among shipments as well as in each one of groups.
Is very important that the gatherer has special care while the wheat with
high humidity is drying, because if the temperature exceeds 65°C, the proteins that form
gluten become damaged, losing its capacity to bind, thus, the wheat is no longer
appropriate for flour making.
If we keep in mind all these, is possible to achieve a correct
classification by wheats quality, thus, incrementing the possibility of higher
prices for our product.
|